I spoke briefly about wireless in a previous post. Here, I’ll discuss some observations from on-the-job learning.
Frequencies
In our setting, the main frequencies we use are 2.4GHz and 5GHz, which is newer. There a pros and cons to each which, although known in theory, can still require on-site experimentation and measurement (with a wifi analyzer) to find the best options. Also, some devices deployed still can’t use 5GHz, so we have to keep that in mind as well.
2.4GHz has lower bandwidth, so it can’t carry data as quickly, BUT it isn’t disrupted as much by walls and has a longer range the 5GHz. 5GHz is faster BUT it has less range and has a harder time getting through walls. This means that knowledge of the AP (access point) placement, as well as the design of the building and expected working areas, is required to determine which frequency to use. Fortunately, the devices we deploy have (at least) two antennae, so we can broadcast on both frequencies.
We also have to be mindful of the standards supported by the devices themselves. This is seen in the “letters” that often follow the channel or frequency listing. The letters reference that actual IEEE standard for the technology – 802.11, 802.11b, 802.11a, 802.11g, 802.11n, and so on. Newer technologies support higher link rates, and different frequencies, but older devices may not support them. We’ve had a few locations where we’ve had to use older, slower technologies because that’s all that was supported on the client devices themselves.
Channel Width
Moving along, we also have Channel Width – this is essentially how “wide” our signal is allowed to be within the frequency we’re using. For example, 2.4GHz is a range of frequencies from 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz – a 100 MHz range. The more channels we have, the more devices can communicate, BUT the more likely they are to interfere with each other, and the less bandwidth available to them. So channel width is a tradeoff between channel overlap and bandwidth – the more bandwidth we allow, the fewer channels available.
Wifi Network Type
In our setting, we have three WiFi network types available – bridge, ad hoc, and mesh.
In Bridge networks, the Access Point is basically just a “bridge” back to the main network device (a firewall in our case). If we use integrated Access Points, we can define all of the wifi information on the firewall, plug the APs in, and they’ll just work. If we use other-vendor APs, we have to define the SSID etc. on the AP, which, when connected to by a wireless device, “bridges” the signal back to the firewall.
I’ve only seen an Ad Hoc network once – this is when the devices just communicate directly with each other over wifi. We only had to do it when the network died, so we got the sales PC wirelessly talking to the sales printer. It was ugly and I don’t recommend it at all if other options are available.
Finally, there’s Mesh wifi. We’ve only had to use it when there’s no easy way to get a wired connection from the APs back to the main network. In Mesh Networking, the AP doesn’t just wireless communicate with the client devices; it also uses a wireless connection to get back to the main network hub.
Conclusion
All that said, we’re fortunate in that, for the most part, our wifi setup is pretty straightforward. We configure the SSID and password on the firewall, plug in our (same-vendor) APs, and done. It’s rare that we have to do much more than that.
Recent Comments