We’ve just finished another national election, and again I’m wondering what percentage of the votes cast boil down to what I call “Betting on the Horse Race Voting” – the idea that, like in a horse race, the idea is to choose the winner before it’s over. In elections, I wonder how many people vote, not on policies or personalities or ideologies or even parties, but simply on who they think will win the election.

An example that is close to my heart is from my own political history – 9th Grade elections for Student Council. Each homeroom elected one candidate. At the end of the election, I found out that I had lost 17-16. My best friend came up after class and confessed that he had voted against me, because he didn’t think I had a chance. Of course, I’m over it now…

Back to the present, how many people are elected like this? I think it’s part of the de facto 2-party system we have – no one votes for a third party candidate because that candidate isn’t seen as having a shot at winning. Why is that? Because no one will vote for that candidate. It’s a circular-reasoning that, as a habitual third-party supporter, drives me crazy.

Of course, the rebuttal is, “Voting for a sure-loser is throwing your vote away.” But again, that betrays the mindset – a vote is only seen as valuable if it “wins.” And that means that a vote is not seen as something cast in support of an ideology, but rather a crude tool that is only useful if victorious. How many soldiers marched proudly to a battle they knew they would lose?

(I’m not comparing myself to Leonidas)

So my exhortation: come 2016, vote with your conscience, not just your idea of how you’ll “win” if your votes are for the winner. There is no excuse to vote for “the lesser of two evils.” We have enough alternate candidates that one of them should be to your liking. Support them – there’s no shame in supporting the right thing even when it fails, but there is in supporting the wrong, no matter what.

For the last few years, I’ve been running a server out of my house – Linux, running on my old laptop (an old Dell Inspiron 1150 – currently ~$40 on Ebay). It’s hosted git repos, I’ve used it for email, filesharing, a wireless print server, etc. It’s been fun. It’s also hosted some web applications I’ve written for people.

In August, after having to update IP addresses several times due to my internet provider changing it, I decided it was time to migrate to a full rig, and to use some of the domains I’ve bought over the years (including this one). While I briefly toyed with the idea of just directing the DNS servers to my 10-year-old laptop, I decided to take the plunge and do “real” hosting online. Managing hardware hasn’t been as fun.

After looking around at various choices, I settled on Amazon Web Services. They offer a “Free tier“,  which provides, among other things, 750 hours monthly usage, 5 gigs of storage, and one “elastic IP” address. That last one lets the DNS servers find your server even if the specific IP address may change (it’s regenerated every time you launch a new server). You get a permanent IP that Amazon maps to the instance-specific one.

I’ve been using it now for about 6 weeks. Other than some confusion over extra billing charges, which although it was my fault, Amazon comped me a full month extra usage to cover it, it’s been smooth sailing. The documentation is great, and includes step-by-step walkthroughs for everything from starting it up to installing WordPress. It’s easy to get up and going. And it’s SO MUCH FUN to have a ‘real’ server on the ‘real’ internet with a ‘real’ domain name.

I’ll talk more about specific perks, as well as issues I’ve found, later on.

As a classically, academically trained musician, I’ve been fascinated for some time as to why “Popular music” deviated from “Academic music” around the end of the 19th century. It’s a topic I’m always interested in hearing opinions on from experts. I’ll confess it’s not a topic I pretend to be an expert on; I’m sure many a musicologist could shoot holes in my views faster than a half cadence in a Sousa march. This week, I’ll attempt to briefly walk through the history of Western music from up to the end of the Medieval period (~AD 1400).

Greek Foundations (~600 BC – AD 500)

Western music seems to have much of its roots in our music theory heritage from the Greeks. From them we’ve received our tonal sequence of eight half- and whole-steps (the black and white keys on a piano, with the last note repeating the first an octave higher), referred to as a diatonic scale. These were arranged into a series of modes – think scales, starting on different white keys: Ionian (C-C), Dorian (D-D), Phrygian (E-E), Mixolydian (F-F), Lydian (G-G), Aeolian (A-A), and Locrian (B-B). Additionally, the ideas of consonance (‘nice’ sounding chords) and dissonance (‘clashing’ chords) come from this time period, though the definitions of consonance and dissonance have shifted. Much of Greek music history was influence by Mr. “a2 + b2 = c2” Pythagoras himself, who mathematically defined many of the intervals we use today, based on the untempered perfect fifth (generated by a string, divided into a ratio expressed as 3:2 – ie, a C string, divided at the point of ratio 3:2, will sound a G).

The Evolution of Chant (~AD 500 – AD 1400)

The early medieval church took many of the Greek diatonic modes and used them as the basic for chants in the liturgy. While all the modes seem to have been used (with the exception of the Locrian, as it is the only mode in which the tonic-dominant interval is a tritone, rather than a perfect fifth – this was seen as an extreme dissonance, and has been referred to as diabolus in musica – “the Devil in music”). As time passed, the primary modes that were used became the Ionian and Aeolian – matching to our modern “major” and “[natural] minor” scales.

While the earliest chants were performed monophonically (no harmony, all voices singing the same notes), gradually the rules were relaxed allowing first octave harmony (the same notes but seperated by octaves), then fifths. This latter development became crucial to much of the later evolution of harmony – because parallel fifths became accepted, the possibility arose of a diminished fifth existing – the aforementioned diabolical tritone. To avoid this, the harmonizing voice was required to stay on a different note – which added a new interval to harmony. Additionally, this caused music to begin having counterpoint – voice wouldn’t necessarily move at the same time.

We’ve now (oh so briefly) covered about 2,000 years of music. Next week, we’ll cover the following 600-odd years to the present.

Read part 2 here

02. November 2014 · Write a comment · Categories: God · Tags:

Obedience to the letter of the law can lead to disobedience to the spirit of the law. Mark 2:23-3:6 gives us two instances of Christ’s early conflicts with the religious authorities over this issue.

In the first passage (Mark 2:23-28), the disciples are plucking grain and eating it on a Sabbath. In the second (Mark 3:1-6), a man with a withered hand is in the Synagogue – perhaps a trap by the Pharisees? – and Jesus heals him. Both of these acts are labeled “working on the Sabbath” by the Pharisees.

In the first passage, the Pharisees’ interpretation is “honoring the Sabbath means self-harm (going hungry and needy instead of eating).” In the second narrative, the Pharisees believe “honoring the Sabbath means harm to others.”

(Of course, both times, the Pharisees are only forcing their interpretation on OTHERS… Luke 11:46)

How often are we like the Pharisees – so focused on obedience that it leads to harm, contrary to God’s will for us in the very passage we seek to obey?

It can take many forms: an isolated devotion to self-righteousness that excludes any evangelistic relationship with others. A heavy focus on “proper” worship and living such that outsiders are kept away*. Or even forms harder to identify: losing sight of the joy of being a child of God because of an improper focus on obedience (more on that another time).

And it need not be so legalistic, either. There are those who preach an ‘easy’ gospel, one of universal salvation and an idolatrous view of God where his love lacks justice. Those who believe God’s love means that they can do whatever they want, free of consequence. They will face a sad moment: crying, “Lord, Lord,” they are answered with “I never knew you – depart from me.” Lasting harm.

I’m not arguing against self-discipline (fasting, abstaining from the world, etc.), or against holding one another accountable. Neglecting those are just as harmful. But when we’re discussing obedience to a passage, we need to make sure we’re living a letter that is in harmony with the spirit of the revelation of a God who saved us, “not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy…so that those who have believed in God may be careful to devote themselves to good works.”

Fortunately, in these very passages Christ gives us the solution: God’s word is always for our own good, not harm; and we should seek and save the lost, regardless of what others think of our methods (provided those methods aren’t sinful). If we find our interpretation deviating from this – we’re wrong.

* I don’t mean, of course, that proper worship and living are unimportant – they’re critical. But as the Pharisees show, when it becomes the focus of our life, rather than a tool in our service to the Focus, it’s another idol. See Mark 2:15-17 for an example of the religious authorities missing this: the Holy and Righteous Son of God still got his hands dirty.

<– Part 13 – October 25, 1914  | Part 14 – November 1, 1914 |  Part 15 – November 8, 1914 –>

On October 26, British forces entered the town of Edea, the Germans continuing their retreat further into the colony.

British and German troop dispositions near Lille

The Ottoman Empire formally entered the war October 29 on the side of the Central Powers. The Russian Empire declared war on the Turks November 1 and launched an offensive led by Georgy Bergmann to secure a defensive position against a possible Ottoman attack.

Flooding on the Yser, indicated by the shaded area

Fighting ended on the Vistula river several days ago, having secured and crossed bridgeheads. The Germans have declared their retreat from the area a strategic repositioning. The Germans suffered another setback October 31 at another river, the Yser in Belgium. Allied forces, unable to defend themselves militarily, flooded the area on the nights of the 26-29th during high tide, forcing the German attack to withdraw due prevent themselves being cut-off to the rear.

The Battle of Coronel, a stunning German victory

The German Empire did have a moment of victory in the Pacific Ocean near Coronel, off the coast of Chile, where the German Kaiserliche Marine under Graf von Spee engaged a British Royal Navy squadron, each having a pair of armored cruisers and several light cruisers. The Germans suffered 3 losses, compared to the British losing nearly 1,600 men and both armored cruisers. However, Graf von Spee expended half of his ammunition, with no way to resupply. Additionally, the Royal Navy again knows where the German force is.

Graf Maximilian von Spee

Rear Admiral Christopher Cradock